SENECAL v. BANK OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: MARY EVELYN SENECAL
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA
Case Number: 4:2019cv00415
Filed: August 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: CHARLES A STAMPELOS
Referring Judge: MARK E WALKER
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2019 Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered pursuant to #7 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 90 Day Exhibit Return Deadline set for 12/26/2019 (toy)
September 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Plaintiff's complaint, ECF No. #1 , is DISMISSED as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted." The Clerk shall also close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 09/26/2019. (toy)
September 26, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. *No objections filed* (toy)
September 23, 2019 Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to MARY EVELYN SENECAL Re: #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. "Return to Sender, Vacant, Unable to Forward." (toy)
September 23, 2019 Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to MARY EVELYN SENECAL Re: #3 Notice to Pro Se. "Return to Sender, Vacant, Unable to Forward." (toy)
August 28, 2019 Opinion or Order **Duplicate - ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 8/28/2019. (lsd)
August 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. #2 , is GRANTED. It is recommended that Plaintiff's complaint, ECF No. #1 , be DISMISSED as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. R&R flag set ( Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 9/25/2019.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 08/28/2019. (toy)
August 27, 2019 Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (toy)
August 27, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. Referred to CHARLES A STAMPELOS. (toy)
August 26, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MARY EVELYN SENECAL. (toy)
August 26, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BANK OF AMERICA, filed by MARY EVELYN SENECAL. (No service copies) (toy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SENECAL v. BANK OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARY EVELYN SENECAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?