ANDREWS v. SPANOS
| JOHN A ANDREWS |
| SPANOS |
| 4:2019cv00437 |
| September 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma For the reasons set forth above, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (Doc. #7 ), be DENIED. This action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The clerk of court close this case file. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 11/22/2019.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 10/25/2019. (jcw) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JOHN A ANDREWS. (jcw) |
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against SPANOS, filed by JOHN A ANDREWS. (No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #6 Amended Complaint. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
Filing 5
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; entered on #1 Complaint. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a 1983 complaint form for use by prisoners, and a form application to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number shall be written on the forms. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint which shall be typed or clearly written, and submitted on this court's form. Within THE SAME TIME PERIOD, Plaintiff shall either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee, or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis on this court's form. ( IFP/Fee due by 10/16/2019. Amended Pleadings due by 10/16/2019.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 9/16/2019. (jcw) (Forms mailed as directed.)
|
| Filing 4 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint, #3 Affidavit in Support. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #1 Complaint by JOHN A ANDREWS. (jcw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JOHN A ANDREWS. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SPANOS, filed by JOHN A ANDREWS. (Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ANDREWS v. SPANOS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SPANOS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOHN A ANDREWS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
