TUNSILL v. CORCORAN et al
Plaintiff: CAMARA BAIYINA NJERI TUNSILL
Defendant: RICHARD CORCORAN and MICHAEL BRYAN
Case Number: 4:2019cv00449
Filed: September 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: CHARLES A STAMPELOS
Referring Judge: MARK E WALKER
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2019 MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge - #16 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Referred to CHARLES A STAMPELOS. (cle)
November 1, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed re: #16 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (cle)
November 1, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed re: #17 Plaintiff's Opposition to #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, #18 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, #19 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment, and #20 Plaintiff's MOTION For Oral Argument and Evidentiary Hearing. Referred to CHARLES A STAMPELOS. (cle)
October 31, 2019 Filing 20 Plaintiff's MOTION For Oral Argument and Evidentiary Hearing, filed by CAMARA BAIYINA NJERI TUNSILL. (cle)
October 31, 2019 Filing 19 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by CAMARA BAIYINA NJERI TUNSILL. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response to summary judgment not filed earlier: 11/21/2019). (cle)
October 31, 2019 Filing 18 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, filed by CAMARA BAIYINA NJERI TUNSILL. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 11/14/2019). (cle)
October 31, 2019 Filing 17 Plaintiff's Opposition to #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by CAMARA BAIYINA NJERI TUNSILL. (cle)
October 31, 2019 Filing 16 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by RICHARD CORCORAN. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 11/14/2019). (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of David Dawkins) (MAPP, KYESHA)
October 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER - Ruling on Defendant Bryan's motion to dismiss, ECF No. #11 , is DEFERRED. Plaintiff has until October 31, 2019, in which to file a memorandum in opposition to the motion to dismiss. Defendant Corcoran has until October 31, 2019, in which to file an answer or other response to Plaintiff's complaint, ECF No. #3 . The Clerk of Court shall return this case upon the filing of Defendant's answer or other response, Plaintiff's opposition, or no later than October 31, 2019. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 10/7/2019. (cle)
October 7, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed re: #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Referred to CHARLES A STAMPELOS. (cle)
October 7, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed re: #12 Summons Returned Executed, #13 Summons Returned Executed, and #14 OBJECTION to #8 MOTION For Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. (cle)
October 7, 2019 Set Memorandum in Opposition and Answer Deadlines. Answer due by 10/31/2019. Memorandum in Opposition due by 10/31/2019. (cle)
October 4, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by MICHAEL BRYAN. (PLATT RADY, KAYLA)
October 3, 2019 Filing 14 OBJECTION to #8 MOTION For Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, filed by CAMARA BAIYINA NJERI TUNSILL. (cle)
October 3, 2019 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CAMARA BAIYINA NJERI TUNSILL. RICHARD CORCORAN served on 9/13/2019, answer due 10/4/2019. (cle)
October 3, 2019 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CAMARA BAIYINA NJERI TUNSILL. MICHAEL BRYAN served on 9/13/2019, answer due 10/4/2019. (cle)
October 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER - Defendant Corcoran's motion for an extension of time, ECF No. #8 , is GRANTED. Defendant Corcoran has until October 31, 2019, in which to file an answer or other response to Plaintiff's complaint, ECF No. #3 . The Clerk of Court shall return this case upon the filing of an answer, notice of appearance of counsel, the filing of a returned summons, or no later than November 12, 2019. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 10/3/2019. (cle)
October 3, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by KYESHA MAPP on behalf of RICHARD CORCORAN (MAPP, KYESHA)
October 3, 2019 Set Answer and Action Required Deadlines. Answer due by 10/31/2019. Notify Chambers on 11/12/2019. (cle)
October 2, 2019 Filing 8 First MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by RICHARD CORCORAN. (BORNTREGER, JASON)
October 2, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed re: #8 First MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. Referred to CHARLES A STAMPELOS. (cle)
September 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER - re: #3 Complaint. Plaintiff shall ensure that each Defendant is served with an identical copy of the complaint, ECF No. #3 , and summons. The Clerk shall forward to Plaintiff a form for consenting to trial by the magistrate judge, with this case number written on it. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of an answer to the complaint or other response as may be appropriate from the Defendants, upon the filing of an executed or unexecuted summons, or no later than 11/12/2019. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 9/12/2019. (cle) *** Magistrate Consent Form sent to the Plaintiff. ***
September 12, 2019 Filing 6 Notice to Pro Se. (cle)
September 12, 2019 Filing 5 Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number FLN400037543. Fee status updated to paid. (cle)
September 12, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to MICHAEL BRYAN. (rcb)
September 12, 2019 Filing 1 Summons Issued as to RICHARD CORCORAN. (rcb)
September 12, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed re: #3 Complaint and 5 Filing Fee Received. (cle)
September 11, 2019 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (cle)
September 11, 2019 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against MICHAEL BRYAN and RICHARD CORCORAN, filed by CAMARA BAIYINA NJERI TUNSILL. (cle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TUNSILL v. CORCORAN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD CORCORAN
Represented By: JASON D BORNTREGER
Represented By: KYESHA MAPP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL BRYAN
Represented By: KAYLA ELIZABETH PLATT RADY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CAMARA BAIYINA NJERI TUNSILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?