ALLEN v. LYONS & FARRAR PA et al
TIMOTHY ALLEN |
HOWARD & ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW PA, LYONS & FARRAR PA, SAMUEL T ADAMS and DOUGLAS S LYONS PA |
4:2019cv00578 |
November 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
MARK E WALKER |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #115 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (rcb) |
Filing 118 Defendants Lyons & Farrar, P.A. and Douglas S. LYONS & FARRAR, P.A. Section 1(a)(ii) Disclosures Pursuant To Initial Scheduling Order (HOLMES, MARY LEE) Modified to edit title on 1/21/2020 (rcb). |
Filing 117 Defendants Samuel T. Adams and Howard & Associates, Attorneys At Law, P.A.S Section 1(a)(ii) Disclosures Pursuant To Initial Scheduling Order (HOLMES, MARY LEE) Modified to edit title on 1/21/2020 (rcb). |
Filing 116 Plaintiff Timothy Allen's Section 1(a)(ii) Disclosures Pursuant To Initial Scheduling Order (HOLMES, MARY LEE) Modified to edit title on 1/21/2020 (rcb). |
Filing 115 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (HOLMES, MARY LEE) |
Filing 114 SCHEDULING AND MEDIATION ORDER - re: #111 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Discovery due by 6/12/2020. Dispositive Motions to be filed by 7/3/2020. Jury Trial set for 11/16/2020 at 8:15 AM in U.S. Courthouse Tallahassee before CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER. Case referred to mediation. Mediation Report due by 7/24/2020. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/16/2020. (cle) |
Filing 113 ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO REFILE DOCUMENTS - re: #111 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. This Court reviewed the Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Conference on January 15, 2020. ECF No. #111 . This Court discovered that the parties attached to the Report Plaintiff's Section 1(a)(ii) Disclosures and Defendants Adams and Howard & Associates' Section 1(a)(ii) Disclosures. The parties are directed to refile these documents as separate entries on the docket. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/16/2020. (cle) |
Filing 112 RULE 26 Disclosures by TIMOTHY ALLEN. (HOLMES, MARY LEE) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #111 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (rcb) |
Filing 111 Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Conference (REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting). (HOLMES, MARY LEE) Modified to edit title on 1/15/2020 (rcb). |
Filing 110 RULE 26 Disclosures by DOUGLAS S LYONS PA, LYONS & FARRAR PA. (BROCK, BENJAMIN) |
Filing 109 RULE 26 Disclosures by SAMUEL T ADAMS, HOWARD & ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW PA. (GUILDAY, THOMAS) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #95 Initial Scheduling Order. (rcb)*** Status Report not filed by 1/13/2020*** |
Filing 108 RESPONSE in Opposition re #99 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by TIMOTHY ALLEN. (HOLMES, MARY LEE) |
Filing 107 Plaintiff's Response In Opposition To Defendant Howard and Associates, Attorneys At Law, P.A. and Samuel T. Adams Motion to Dismiss [DOC. 99] filed by TIMOTHY ALLEN. (HOLMES, MARY LEE) Modified to edit title on 1/14/2020 (rcb). |
Filing 106 RESPONSE in Opposition re #100 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by TIMOTHY ALLEN. (HOLMES, MARY LEE) |
Filing 105 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS.This Court has considered, without hearing, Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responses in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. ECF No. #104 . The motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his responses to the pending motions to dismiss, ECF Nos. #99 and #100 , on or before 1/13/2020. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/30/19. (blb) |
Filing 104 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by TIMOTHY ALLEN. (HOLMES, MARY LEE) |
Filing 103 ORDER DENYING #96 MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. #96 , is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/20/2019. (rcb) |
Filing 102 DEFENDANTS HOWARD & ASSOCIATES, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P.A., AND SAMUEL T. ADAMS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS(GUILDAY, THOMAS) Modified on 12/20/2019 (rcb). |
Filing 101 DEFENDANT LYONS & FARRAR, P.A.S & DOUGLAS S. LYONS, P.A.S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR STAY filed by DOUGLAS S LYONS PA, LYONS & FARRAR PA. (BROCK, BENJAMIN) Modified to edit title on 12/20/2019 (rcb). |
Set Response to Motion Deadline as to #100 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 12/30/2019). (toy) |
Filing 100 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by DOUGLAS S LYONS PA, LYONS & FARRAR PA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Statistics on Appeals for Incompleteness) (BROCK, BENJAMIN) |
Filing 99 MOTION to Dismiss ( (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 12/30/2019).), MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by SAMUEL T ADAMS, HOWARD & ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW PA. (SICKLER, WILLIAM) |
Filing 98 NOTICE of Appearance by BENJAMIN AARON BROCK on behalf of DOUGLAS S LYONS PA, LYONS & FARRAR PA (BROCK, BENJAMIN) |
Filing 97 ORDER DIRECTING EXPEDITED RESPONSE re #96 . Defendants must respond to the motion not later than Thursday, December 19, 2019. (Response to motion due by 12/19/2019.). Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/16/2019. (toy) |
Set Response to Motion Deadline as to #96 MOTION to Stay Proceedings. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 12/30/2019). (toy) |
Filing 96 MOTION to Stay Proceedings by TIMOTHY ALLEN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Appeal) (HOLMES, MARY LEE) |
Filing 95 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER : Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 12/26/2019. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/27/2020. Discovery due by 4/13/2020. Status Report due by 1/13/2020. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/12/2019. (toy) |
Filing 94 ORDER ADMITTING MARY LEE HOLMES PRO HAC VICE Re: #93 . Ms. Holmes has fulfilled the requirements of the Local Rules for admission and is admitted pro hac vice as counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/12/2019. (toy) |
Filing 93 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Mary Lee Holmes.( Filing fee $ 201 receipt number AFLNDC-4738348.) by TIMOTHY ALLEN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (HOLMES, MARY LEE) |
Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING #2 EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO #38 AMENDED COMPLAINT. Defendants shall file their responsive pleadings to the Amended Complaint on or before December 16, 2019. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/05/2019. (toy) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings (Internal deadline for referral to judge if responses to amended complaint by Defendants (Lyons & Farrar, P.A., Douglas S. Lyons, P.A., Howard & Associates, Attorneys at Law, P.A., and Samuel T. Adams, P.A.,) not filed earlier: 12/16/2019). (toy) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by SAMUEL T ADAMS, DOUGLAS S LYONS PA, HOWARD & ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW PA, LYONS & FARRAR PA. (GUILDAY, THOMAS) |
Filing 1 Memorandum Opinion And Order from the United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Eastern Division signed by Keith Starrett, District Judge. (Attachments: #1 Letter of Transfer USDC Mississippi Southern, #2 Mississippi Southern Docket) (toy) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings Atty Admissions due by 12/11/2019. (toy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.