BALDWIN v. INCH
THOMAS J BALDWIN |
MARK S INCH |
4:2019cv00605 |
December 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
MARK E WALKER |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO AMENDED 2254 PETITION - The Clerk shall serve copies of the amended 2254 petition (ECF No. #6 ) and this order on Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Respondent shall file an answer, motion, or other response to the petition on or before 4/27/2020. Petitioner shall file a reply, if any, no later than 5/27/2020. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 1/27/2020. (cle) ** All paperwork prepared and sent to Respondent and FL AG. *** |
Filing 6 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by THOMAS J BALDWIN. (cle) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed re: #6 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Referred to CHARLES A STAMPELOS. (cle) |
Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO 2254 PETITION - re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Clerk shall serve copies of the 2254 petition (ECF No. #1 ) and this order on Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Respondent shall file an answer, motion, or other response to the petition on or before 4/23/2020. Petitioner shall file a reply, if any, no later than 5/23/2020. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 1/23/2020. (cle) *** All paperwork prepared and served on the Respondent and FL AG. *** |
Filing 4 Filing Fee: $5.00, receipt number FLN400038396. Fee status updated to paid. (cle) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed re: $5.00 Filing Fee Received. (cle) |
Filing 3 ORDER - re : #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Clerk of Court shall forward to Petitioner an application for leave to proceed IFP. Petitioner shall have until 1/21/2020, to either submit a complete IFP application or pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 12/19/2019. (cle) *** IFP sent to the Petitioner. *** |
Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se. (cle) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (cle) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by THOMAS J BALDWIN. (cle) *** No Service Copy provided. No filing fee paid or IFP filed. *** |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BALDWIN v. INCH | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MARK S INCH | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: THOMAS J BALDWIN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.