COMBS v. REFRESH CANOPY COVE INC
DONDA COMBS |
REFRESH CANOPY COVE, INC. and REFRESH CANOPY COVE INC |
4:2020cv00124 |
March 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
WILLIAM STAFFORD |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Plaintiff's unopposed motion (ECF No. #7 ) for an extension of time is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have up to and including 5/18/2020, to respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 4/28/20. (blb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD notified that action is needed Re: #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION TO DISMISS. (blb) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Refresh Canopy Cove, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment Regarding, Plaintiff's Complaint and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof by DONDA COMBS. (STORCH, NOAH) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION TO DISMISS filed. (blb) |
Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Refresh Canopy Cove, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment Regarding, Plaintiff's Complaint and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof by REFRESH CANOPY COVE INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (AUSTIN, MICHAEL) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Before the court is Defendant's unopposed motion (ECF No. #4 ) for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. The court having reviewed the motion, it is ORDERED: Defendant's unopposed motion (ECF No. #4 ) for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint is GRANTED. Defendant shall have up to and including 4/13/2020, to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 3/31/20. (blb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. (blb) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Refresh Canopy Cove, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by REFRESH CANOPY COVE INC. (AUSTIN, MICHAEL) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to REFRESH CANOPY COVE INC. (blb) |
Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #1 Complaint filed by DONDA COMBS- Counsel is advised by this entry, for future case openings: The Civil Cover Sheet should be filed as a separate entry using the event selection "Civil Cover Sheet" which is found under "Other Filings" under "Other Documents". Please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or Chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide", (both available on the clerk's website) specifically in regards to the use of LOWER PUNCTUATION in the parties names and style of the case. (blb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against REFRESH CANOPY COVE, INC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4926757.), filed by DONDA COMBS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (STORCH, NOAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.