BOWENS v. WARDEN
| E-YAGE BOWENS |
| WARDEN |
| 4:2020cv00136 |
| March 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #7 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. 90 Day Exhibit Return Deadline set for 8/3/2020 (rcb) |
Filing 7
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The #4 report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "The Petitioners petition, ECF No. #1 , is DISMISSED and the motion to waive the filing fee, ECF No. #2 , is DENIED." The Clerk shall also close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 5/5/2020. (rcb)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK for all further proceedings. MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS no longer assigned to case. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 4/3/2020. Motions referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. **Please use the new judge's initials for all future filings: 4:20cv136-MW/MAF. (amm)
|
| Filing 5 Request For Judicial Clarification by E-YAGE BOWENS (rcb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #5 Request For Judicial Clarification (rcb) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Petitioners petition, ECF No. #1 , be DISMISSED and the motion to waive the filing fee, ECF No. #2 , be DENIED.- Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 3/12/2020. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 4/9/2020. (rcb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under USC 2241 #2 Waiver Of Filing Fee Due To Imminent Danger Of Serious Physical Injury; Demand For Emergency Preliminary Temporary Injunction(s) Instructions For Clerk. Referred to CHARLES A STAMPELOS. (rcb) |
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) |
| Filing 2 Waiver Of Filing Fee Due To Imminent Danger Of Serious Physical Injury; Demand For Emergency Preliminary Temporary Injunction(s) Instructions For Clerk by E-YAGE BOWENS. (rcb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under USC 2241, filed by E-YAGE BOWENS. (rcb)**1 Service Copy Received** |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BOWENS v. WARDEN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: E-YAGE BOWENS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
