EKES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: MICHAEL RAY EKES
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 4:2020cv00144
Filed: March 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Referring Judge: T KENT WETHERELL
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2020 Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - That this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida for all further proceedings. That the clerk of court be directed to close the file. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 4/21/2020. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 5/19/2020. (mb)
April 20, 2020 Filing 6 RESPONSE TO #3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by MICHAEL RAY EKES. (mb)
April 20, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #6 RESPONSE TO #3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by MICHAEL RAY EKES. (mb)
March 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. Plaintiffs motion for extension of time (ECF No. #4 ) is GRANTED. The time for Plaintiff to show cause, if any, why this case should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, is extended to APRIL 30, 2020. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 3/31/2020. (mb)
March 31, 2020 Set Deadlines re #5 ORDER. Show Cause Response due by 4/30/2020. (mb)
March 30, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Extend Time ("RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE"), by MICHAEL RAY EKES. (mb)
March 30, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #4 Response to #3 Order to Show Cause. (mb)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS from the date of this order, Plaintiff must show cause, if any, why this case should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 3/19/2020. (Show Cause Response due by 4/9/2020). (mb)
March 16, 2020 Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, MICHAEL RAY EKES. (mb)
March 16, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (No service copies/fee not paid/no IFP Motion). Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (mb)
March 11, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, filed by MICHAEL RAY EKES. (No service copies/fee not paid/no IFP Motion). (mb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EKES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL RAY EKES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?