WOODARD v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Plaintiff: STEVE LARON WOODARD, SR
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAMILTON CI ANNEX and EASTBERG
Case Number: 4:2020cv00216
Filed: April 27, 2020
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: HOPE T CANNON
Referring Judge: T KENT WETHERELL
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2020 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against EASTBERG, filed by STEVE LARON WOODARD, SR. (No service copy). (mb)
June 11, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #6 Amended Complaint. (No service copy). (mb)
May 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. The clerk shall forward to Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form for use by prisoners in actions under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The clerk is directed to terminate the Florida Department of Corrections and Hamilton Correctional Institution Annex as defendants in this action and update the docket to reflect that Officer Eastberg is the sole defendant. (Amended COMPLAINT due by 6/15/2020.) (Form mailed w/ORDER). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 5/13/2020. (mb)
May 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. The clerk shall mail a copy of this order with the appropriate cover letter to: Department of Corrections. Fee status updated to in forma pauperis. (Letter w/ORDER mailed to DOC). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 5/1/2020. (mb)
April 28, 2020 Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, STEVE LARON WOODARD, SR. (mb)
April 28, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint (No service copies), #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb)
April 27, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by STEVE LARON WOODARD, SR. (mb)
April 27, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAMILTON CI ANNEX, filed by STEVE LARON WOODARD, SR. (No service copies). (mb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WOODARD v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STEVE LARON WOODARD, SR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HAMILTON CI ANNEX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EASTBERG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?