JULES v. BARR
JEAN JULES |
WILLIAM P BARR |
4:2020cv00287 |
June 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
MARK E WALKER |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 6 Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in Middle District of Florida as case 3:20-cv-00701, filed 07/07/2020. (blb) |
Filing 8 ORDER DENYING MOTION AS MOOT. Petitioner has filed his Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice. ECF No. #7 . This Court entered its Order Accepting and Adopting Report and Recommendation on July 6, 2020, in which it transferred this case to the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division. ECF No. #5 . The motion, ECF No. #7 , is DENIED as moot. This case is closed. Petitioner must file his motion in the Middle District of Florida. The Clerk must close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 7/8/20. (blb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss (blb) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice by JEAN JULES. (blb) |
Filing 6 Interdistrict Transfer to the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville located at 300 North Hogan Street Jacksonville, Florida 32202. (blb) |
Filing 5 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. This case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division, for all further proceedings. The Clerk shall also close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 7/6/20. (blb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #4 Notice of Inquiry. (blb) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Inquiry by JEAN JULES re #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (blb) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is RECOMMENDED that this case be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division, for all further proceedings. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 6/5/20. R&R flag set. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 7/6/2020. (blb) |
Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (blb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (blb) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JEAN JULES. (blb)*No copies, No fee* |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: JULES v. BARR | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: JEAN JULES | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: WILLIAM P BARR | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.