RODRIGUEZ v. DESANTIS et al
| FELIX LUIS RODRIGUEZ |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK INCH and RON DESANTIS |
| 4:2020cv00319 |
| June 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| WILLIAM STAFFORD |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER - Ruling on Plaintiff's in forma pauperis motion, ECF No. #6 , remains DEFERRED until 8/19/2020. Plaintiff has until 8/19/2020, to either file a notice of voluntary dismissal if he concedes that this case cannot proceed as filed, or to file a "second amended complaint" if there is a basis to do so. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of Plaintiff's filing a response to this Order, or no later than 8/19/2020. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 7/29/2020. (cle)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed re: #8 First Amended Complaint. (cle) |
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED Prisoner's COMPLAINT For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against RON DESANTIS, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, and MARK INCH, filed by FELIX LUIS RODRIGUEZ. (cle) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER - Ruling on Plaintiff's in forma pauperis motion, ECF No. #6 , is DEFERRED. Plaintiff has until 8/14/2020, to clarify whether he intends this case to proceed as: (1) a civil rights action challenging the conditions of his confinement or (2) a habeas case seeking release, or speedier release, from his incarceration. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of Plaintiff's compliance with this Order, or no later than 8/14/2020. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 7/14/2020. (cle)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed re: #5 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (cle) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by FELIX LUIS RODRIGUEZ. (cle) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by FELIX LUIS RODRIGUEZ. (cle) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge - re: #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (cle) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - re: #1 Complaint. The Clerk of Court shall forward to Plaintiff an application packet for requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has until 7/21/2020, to either: (1) file a motion requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis or (2) pay the full amount of the filing fee ($400.00 if paid in full). The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of Plaintiff's compliance with this Order, or no later than 7/21/2020. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 6/19/2020. (cle) *** IFP sent to the Plaintiff. ***
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se. (cle) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed re: #1 Complaint and #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. (cle) |
| Filing 2 MOTION For Appointment of Counsel, filed by FELIX LUIS RODRIGUEZ. (cle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RON DESANTIS, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, and MARK INCH, filed by FELIX LUIS RODRIGUEZ. (cle) *** No Service Copies provided. No IFP filed or Filing Fee paid. *** |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
