HANF v. INCH
STEPHEN C HANF |
MARK S INCH |
4:2020cv00330 |
June 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
T KENT WETHERELL |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The clerk is directed to furnish a copy of the petition (ECF No. #1 ), with a copy of this order, to Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida. The deadline for Respondent to file a response to the petition is ninety days from the date of this order. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 11/2/2020). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 8/3/2020. (alb) Modified on 8/4/2020 copies mailed certified mail (alb). |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: 8 Docket Annotation. Clerk received 2 service copies. (alb) |
Filing 8 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #7 Order. Clerks received 2 service copies. (alb) |
Filing 7 ORDER. Within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, Petitioner must provide the court with two complete copies of the habeas petition. (Service copies by 8/10/2020.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 7/9/2020. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: 6 Filing Fee Received. (alb) |
Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number FLN400039472. Fee status updated to paid. (alb) |
Filing 5 ORDER denying without prejudice, #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 7/2/2020. (alb) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee to the clerk of court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.( Fee due by 7/31/2020.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 07/01/2020. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (alb) |
Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by STEPHEN C HANF. (alb) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by STEPHEN C HANF. (No service copies.) (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HANF v. INCH | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MARK S INCH | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: STEPHEN C HANF | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.