JOYNER v. INCH
CARLTON G JOYNER |
MARK INCH |
4:2020cv00337 |
June 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
HOPE T CANNON |
MARK E WALKER |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. ORDERED that the clerk shall serve a copy of the petition (ECF Doc. #1 ) and this Order and Report and Recommendation to the Respondent, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, Mark Inch, by providing a copy of same to the Secretary and to the Florida Attorney General. RECOMMENDED that the petition, ECF Doc. #1 , be DISMISSED under Habeas Rule 4. That a certificate of appealability be DENIED. That the clerk be directed to close the file. R&R flag set. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 9/14 /2020.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 08/17/2020. (order w/ petition via cert mail to Resp and Atty Gen) (sdw) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk shall refer the petition back to the undersigned to pre-screen the petition under Habeas Rule 4 and determine whether it is suitable for service. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 08/13/2020. (sdw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (sdw) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by CARLTON G JOYNER. (sdw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (sdw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #3 Order. (no filing fee/IFP motion received) (sdw) |
Filing 3 ORDER. The clerk shall send Petitioner a form application to proceed in forma pauperis. Within thirty days from the date of this order, Petitioner shall either pay the full $5.00 filing fee or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. ( Fee due by 8/10/2020.) (Order and form mailed.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 7/10/2020. (alb) |
Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se litigant CARLTON G JOYNER. (sdw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (sdw) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by CARLTON G JOYNER. (3 service copies)(no filing fee/IFP motion) (sdw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: JOYNER v. INCH | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MARK INCH | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: CARLTON G JOYNER | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.