BERLIN v. INCH
Petitioner: AARON DAVID BERLIN
Respondent: MARK S INCH and JAMES GILL
Case Number: 4:2020cv00354
Filed: July 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: MICHAEL J FRANK
Referring Judge: WILLIAM STAFFORD
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by BARBARA CATHERINE DEBELIUS-ENEMARK, I on behalf of MARK S INCH (DEBELIUS-ENEMARK, BARBARA)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Clerk of Court shall furnish a copy of the petition and this order to Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Within NINETY (90) DAYS (10/28/2020) from the docketing date of this order, Respondent shall file an answer as directed by this order. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 7/30/2020. (jcw)(cc: Respondent, Attorney General)
July 29, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: 4 Filing Fee Received, Copy fee received. (jcw)
July 27, 2020 Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number FLN4-39626. Fee status updated to paid.. Copy fee of $25.00 received re #3 Order. (jcw)
July 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The clerk shall forward to Petitioner a form application to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number shall be written on the form. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS (8/17/2020) from the date of this order, Petitioner shall submit payment in the amount of $5.00, or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. Within the SAME TIME (8/17/2020), Petitioner shall (1) provide the court with two identical service copies of his petition, or (2) submit payment in the amount of $25.00 to the clerk of court for the cost of copying his 25-page petition. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 7/16/2020. (jcw)(Form sent as ordered.)
July 15, 2020 Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (jcw)
July 15, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jcw)
July 13, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by AARON DAVID BERLIN. (Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BERLIN v. INCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARK S INCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JAMES GILL
Represented By: BARBARA CATHERINE DEBELIUS-ENEMARK, I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: AARON DAVID BERLIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?