DEMPS v. INCH
| WILLIAM JAMAL DEMPS |
| MARK S INCH and JAMES GILL |
| 4:2020cv00399 |
| August 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| WILLIAM STAFFORD |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in Southern District of Florida as case 0:20-cv-61633, filed 08/12/2020. (sdw) |
| Filing 4 Interdistrict Transfer to the Southern District of Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division, located at US Federal Building and Courthouse, 299 East Broward Blvd #108, Fort Lauderdale FL 33301. (sdw) |
Filing 3
ORDER. The clerk of court is directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for all further proceedings. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 08/11/2020. (sdw)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se litigant WILLIAM JAMAL DEMPS. (sdw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (sdw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by WILLIAM JAMAL DEMPS. (no filing fee/IFP motion)(no service copies) (sdw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
