MAXWELL v. HIGGINS et al
| DANIEL K MAXWELL |
| JEFFERY E LEWIS, CANDICE K BROWER and BRIAN A HIGGINS |
| 4:2020cv00463 |
| September 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| WILLIAM STAFFORD |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Re: #3 ORDER. RETURN TO SENDER (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #4 Mail Returned. (jcw) |
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Complaint. The clerk of the court shall send to Plaintiff a motion to proceed in forma pauperis for use by prisoners. This case number should be written on the forms. On or before 11/27/2020, Plaintiff shall:a. pay $400.00 ($350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee); or submit a fully completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis for use by prisoners. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 10/26/2020. (jcw)(Form sent as ordered.)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CANDICE K BROWER, BRIAN A HIGGINS, JEFFERY E LEWIS, filed by DANIEL K MAXWELL. (Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
