BASS v. INCH
| MARTREY D BASS |
| STATE OF FLORIDA and MARK S INCH |
| 4:2020cv00506 |
| October 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| T KENT WETHERELL |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadlines re 11 ORDER. (Second Amended Petition and Motion to Amend due by 1/11/2021). (mb) |
Filing 9
ORDER. The clerk of court is directed to send Petitioner a 2254 petition form. Petitioner's motion to amend (ECF No. #8 ) is DENIED without prejudice to Petitioner's re-filing a motion to amend and a proposed second amended petition on the court-approved petition form, within thirty days of the date of this order. (Form mailed w/ORDER). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 12/11/2020. (mb)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Amend, by MARTREY D BASS. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #8 MOTION for Leave to Amend. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (mb) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER. The clerk of court is directed to modify the docket to reflect that Mark S. Inch is the sole Respondent. Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #5 ) is GRANTED to the extent that Petitioner may proceed with this case without paying the filing fee. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Petitioner must provide the court with two (2) complete copies of the amended habeas petition (ECF No. #4 ). (2 service copies due by 12/31/2020.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 12/1/2020. (mb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #6 MEMORANDUM OF LAW re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (mb) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OF LAW re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by MARTREY D BASS. (mb) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MARTREY D BASS. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #4 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (No service copies). Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (mb) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MARTREY D BASS. (No service copies). (mb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. The clerk of court is directed to send Petitioner a 2254 petition form, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and a prisoner consent form and financial certificate. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either pay the filing fee of $5.00, or file a fully completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the requisite prisoner consent form and financial certificate. (Amended Habeas Petition due by 11/28/2020. Habeas filing fee or IFP Motion due by 11/28/2020.) (Forms mailed w/ORDER). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 10/28/2020. (mb)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se litigant MARTREY D BASS. (sdw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MARTREY D BASS. (no service copies)(no filing fee/IFP motion) (sdw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (sdw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
