HERRIN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
| GLEN HERRIN |
| COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 4:2021cv00135 |
| March 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (All documents sent to USMS for service per #4 ORDER). (mb) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of receipt of 3 service copies per #4 Order. (Awaiting hard copies of 3 service copies from Tallahassee divisional office to issue summons). (mb) |
Filing 4
ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #1 -2) is GRANTED. The clerk shall docket the motion as a separate filing. Within seven (7) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall submit to the Court three (3) service copies of the complaint (ECF Doc. #1 ). Upon receipt of these materials, the clerk is directed to issue the summonses submitted by Plaintiff and send them, along with three (3) certified copies of this order, the service copies of the complaint, and the prepared USM-285 forms to the United States Marshals Service. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 3/26/2021. (mb)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by GLEN HERRIN. (mb) Modified on 3/26/2021 to note filed separately per #4 ORDER. (mb). |
| Set Deadlines re #4 ORDER. (3 Service Copies due by 4/2/2021). (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #3 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. (mb) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis should be filed as a separate document to ensure proper docket entry and proper tracking/reporting. (Summons to be issued are on hold until IFP Motion has been ruled on by the Judge). (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GLEN HERRIN, filed by GLEN HERRIN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #3 Supplement Proposed Summons (Atty Gen), #4 Supplement Proposed Summons (SSA), #5 Supplement Proposed Summons (US Atty), #6 Supplement USM-85 (Atty Gen), #7 Supplement USM-85 (SSA), #8 Supplement USM-85 (US Atty)) (LIEBENHAUT, MATTHEW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HERRIN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: GLEN HERRIN | |
| Represented By: | MATTHEW DAVID LIEBENHAUT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
