ELDRIDGE v ALLIED INTERSTATE LLC
Gordon Eldridge |
ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC and ALLIED INTERSTATE LLC |
4:2021cv00158 |
April 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
MARK E WALKER |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadlines/Hearings Status Report due by 6/14/2021. (rcb) |
Filing 11 ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING #10 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. Plaintiff has filed a notice, ECF No. #10 , indicating that the parties have tentatively settled this case. This Court acknowledges the parties notice. The parties have indicated their intention to and are hereby directed to notify this Court once a settlement has been finalized. This Court declines to stay any discovery deadlines in the interim. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 05/10/2021. (rcb) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement by GORDON ELDRIDGE (HERMAN, PAUL) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #9 Order, Set Deadlines/Hearings (rcb)**Response to complaint not filed by Allied Interstate by 5/7/2021** |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #8 MOTION FOR EXTENSION - Defendant may respond to the Complaint on or before 5/7/2021. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 5/3/2021. (vkm) |
Filing 8 ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. (SIMMS-PETREDIS, JACQUELINE) Modified to edit title on 5/3/2021 (rcb). |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: Set Deadlines/Hearings: Attorney Admission Deadline by 4/27/2021 (rcb)**Attorney Admissions Deadline due for Attorney Thomas J Patti by 4/27/2021** |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by ALLIED INTERSTATE LLC identifying Other Affiliate iQor US Inc. for ALLIED INTERSTATE LLC.. (SIMMS-PETREDIS, JACQUELINE) |
Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING #5 MOTION FOR EXTENSION. The motion, ECF No. #5 , is GRANTED. Defendant may respond to the Complaint on or before 5/3/2021. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 04/20/2021. (rcb) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by ALLIED INTERSTATE LLC. (SIMMS-PETREDIS, JACQUELINE) |
Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 4/27/2021. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/27/2021. Discovery due by 8/11/2021. Status Report due by 5/13/2021. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 04/13/2021. (rcb) |
Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #1 Notice of Removal.JACQUELINE SIMMS-PETREDIS Party names (including aliases) are to be added using all caps and no punctuation. (See "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing," available on Clerk's website.) The party names will be corrected by the clerk. (rcb) |
Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: ISO placed in Judge Walker's folder. (rcb) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings Attorney Admissions Deadline due for Attorney Thomas J Patti by 4/27/2021. (rcb)**Attorney Admission letter and email forwarded to Attorney Thomas J Patti** |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC from Leon County Court, case number 2021-SC-000399. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6031995.), filed by ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (SIMMS-PETREDIS, JACQUELINE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.