ENDRES v. GILCO COURIER SERVICE INC
| Jeremy Endres |
| Gilco Courier Service, Inc. and GILCO COURIER SERVICE INC |
| 4:2021cv00183 |
| May 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (KOSTELNIK, KEVIN) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Gilco Courier Service, Inc. (cle) |
| Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: TO ATTORNEY KEVIN KOSTELNIK - re: #1 Complaint. In this District, party names (including aliases) are to be added using all caps and no punctuation. (See "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing," available on Clerk's website.) The party names will be corrected by the clerk. Further, counsel is advised by this entry, that a Civil Cover Sheet must be filed as a separate entry using the event selection "Civil Cover Sheet" which is found under "Other Filings" under "Other Documents". PLEASE RE-FILE THE CIVIL COVER SHEET. (cle) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Summons by Jeremy Endres (KOSTELNIK, KEVIN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gilco Courier Service, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6078232.), filed by Jeremy Endres. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (KOSTELNIK, KEVIN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
