MATHIS v. INCH
RICHARD MATHIS |
MARK S INCH |
4:2021cv00252 |
June 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
WILLIAM STAFFORD |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #5 ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER'S #1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 90 Day Exhibit Return Deadline set for 11/16/2021 (rcb) |
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER'S #1 PETITIONFOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. #3 ) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order. The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED as an unauthorized successive petition, over which this court lacks jurisdiction. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction." A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 08/18/2021. (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD notified that action is needed Re: #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by RICHARD MATHIS - R&R flag set (rcb)**Objections to R & R not filed by 8/12/2021** |
Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number FLN4000042165. Fee status updated to paid. (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD notified that action is needed Re: 4 Filing Fee Received (rcb) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is therefore respectfully RECOMMENDED that the 2254 petition (ECF No. #1 ) be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as it is an unauthorized successive petition. It is further RECOMMENDED that a certificate of appealability be DENIED and that leave to appeal in forma pauperis be DENIED. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 07/15/2021. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 8/12/2021. (rcb) |
Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
Filing 1 PETITION UNDER 28 USC 2254against MARK S INCH, filed by RICHARD MATHIS. (rcb)(2) Service Copies Received Modified to edit docket text on 7/14/2021 (rcb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MATHIS v. INCH | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MARK S INCH | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: RICHARD MATHIS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.