AGRAWAL v. MAYORKAS et al
KAMLESH B AGRAWAL |
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MICHAEL W MEADE and MARK INCH |
4:2021cv00346 |
August 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
WILLIAM STAFFORD |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by LENNARD B REGISTER, III on behalf of ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS (REGISTER, LENNARD) |
Filing 10 ORDER and AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the urgent petition for writ of habeas corpus and/or prohibition, ECF No. #1 , be DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. R&R flag set (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 10/15/2021. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 09/17/2021. (rcb) |
Filing 9 ORDER and AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is ORDERED that Petitioner's objections, ECF No. #8 , be construed as a motion for reconsideration and be GRANTED to the extent that this case has been reviewed. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 9/17/2021. (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD notified that action is needed Re: #8 PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (rcb) |
Filing 8 PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by KAMLESH B AGRAWAL. (rcb) |
Filing 7 ORDER. Petitioner's motion for an extension of time, ECF No. #6 , isGRANTED. Plaintiff shall have until September 30, 2021, in which to file his objections to the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. #5 . Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 9/13/2021. (rcb) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 9/30/2021. (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objection to R & R Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objection to R & R by KAMLESH B AGRAWAL. (rcb) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the "urgent petition for writ of habeas corpus and/or prohibition, ECF No. #1 , be DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. R&R flag set. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 9/15/2021. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 08/18/2021. (rcb) |
Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #2 APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF URGENT PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND/OR PROHIBITION, #1 URGENT PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND/OR PROHIBITION. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb)**No service copies of ECF #1 ** Modified on 8/18/2021 (rcb). |
Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number FLN400042382. Fee status updated to paid. (rcb) |
Filing 2 APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF URGENT PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND/OR PROHIBITION by KAMLESH B AGRAWAL (rcb) |
Filing 1 URGENT PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND/OR PROHIBITION, filed by KAMLESH B AGRAWAL. (rcb) **No service copies** |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.