JONES v. ROLLING FRITO-LAY SALES, LP
| JOSHUA D JONES |
| ROLLING FRITO-LAY SALES, LP |
| 4:2021cv00481 |
| December 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Plaintiff's Statement of Compliance With Rule 26 by JOSHUA D JONES (MATTOX, MARIE) |
| Set Deadlines: Mediation Report due by 7/13/2022. (tpm) |
Filing 8
SCHEDULING AND MEDIATION ORDER Re: #7 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting - Discovery due by 6/1/2022. Dispositive Motions to be filed by 6/22/2022. Jury Trial set for 11/21/2022 08:15 AM in U.S. Courthouse Tallahassee before CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER. Mediation Report due by 7/13/2022. Case referred to mediation. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 01/07/2022. (tpm) Modified as to Mediation Report Deadline on 1/13/2022 (tpm).
|
| Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (MILES, DANIEL) |
| Filing 6 STATUS REPORT by ROLLING FRITO-LAY SALES, LP. (CASTILLO, MELISSA) |
| Reset Deadlines: Status Report due by 2/2/2022. (tpm) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint and Defenses by ROLLING FRITO-LAY SALES, LP. (MILES, DANIEL) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by ROLLING FRITO-LAY SALES, LP. (SILER-NIXON, DAWN) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER : Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 12/17/2021. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/18/2022. Discovery due by 4/1/2022. Status Report due by 1/3/2022. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/3/2021. (tpm)
|
| CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER and MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK added. (tpm) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (tpm) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from the Second Judicial Circuit in and for Leon County, Florida, case number 2021-CA-001559 FILING FEE PAID (RECEIPT # AFLNDC-6568843), filed by ROLLING FRITO-LAY SALES, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (Complaint), #2 Exhibit (Return of Service), #3 Exhibit (State Court File), #4 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit (Declaration of Corporate Representation), #6 Exhibit (State Court Civil Cover Sheet)) (tpm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JONES v. ROLLING FRITO-LAY SALES, LP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOSHUA D JONES | |
| Represented By: | MARIE A MATTOX |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ROLLING FRITO-LAY SALES, LP | |
| Represented By: | DANIEL KENT MILES |
| Represented By: | DAWN SILER-NIXON |
| Represented By: | MELISSA MARIE CASTILLO |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
