TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. LAT 29 INC et al
| TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| LAT 29 INC doing business as CRABBIE DAD'S BAR & SPIRITS, CONNIE MILITO and LAT 29 INC A FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION doing business as CRABBIE DAD'S BAR & SPIRITS |
| 4:2021cv00508 |
| December 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT CONNIE MILITO, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OFHER NIECE, GISELLA MILITO, ACTING ON BEHALF OFTHE ESTATE AND ALL SURVIVORS. 90 Day Exhibit Return Deadline set for 5/19/2022 (rcb) |
Filing 8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT CONNIE MILITO, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF HER NIECE, GISELLA MILITO, ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE AND ALL SURVIVORS. Accordingly, the Court hereby DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Defendant, CONNIE MILITO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of her niece, GISELLA MILITO, acting on behalf of the Estate and all Survivors from this declaratory judgment action. I expressly determine that there is no just reason for delay and direct the clerk to enter judgment stating, "Based on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), all claims against the defendant Connie Milito, as personal representative of the estate of Gisella Milito, acting on behalf of the estate and all survivors, are dismissed with prejudice." Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 02/17/2022. (rcb)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal Stipulated Request for Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendant, Connie Milito as Personal Representative by TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit -Proposed Order) (DE LEON, JACQUELINE) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY identifying Corporate Parent Trisura Group Ltd, Other Affiliate TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY for TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.. (DE LEON, JACQUELINE) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (DE LEON, JACQUELINE) |
| Filing 4 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #1 Complaint, filed by TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY Counsel is advised by this entry, that a Civil Cover Sheet must be filed as a separate entry using the event selection "Civil Cover Sheet" which is found under "Other Filings" under "Other Documents". PLEASE RE-FILE THE CIVIL COVER SHEET (rcb) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. CONNIE MILITO waiver sent on 1/5/2022, answer due 3/7/2022. (DE LEON, JACQUELINE) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. LAT 29 INC waiver sent on 1/5/2022, answer due 3/7/2022. (DE LEON, JACQUELINE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6602426.), filed by TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplement Summons to Defendant, LAT 29 Inc, #5 Supplement Summons to Defendant, Connie Milito) (DE LEON, JACQUELINE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
