JABIL INC v. ESSENTIUM INC
| JABIL INC |
| ESSENTIUM INC |
| 4:2021mc00004 |
| April 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in Middle District of Florida as case 8:21-mc-00057, filed 04/20/2021. (blb) Case manager in Middle District will assign as related case to 8:19cv1567-T-23SPF for consideration. |
| Filing 5 Interdistrict Transfer to the Middle District of Florida Tampa Division, located at 801 North Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33602. (blb) |
Filing 4
ORDER. The joint motion to transfer, ECF No. #3 , is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall transfer the case initiating motion, ECF No. #1 , to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida to be filed in case number 8:19cv1567-T-23SPF. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 4/20/21. (blb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #3 Joint MOTION re #1 MOTION to Quash to Transfer Subpoena-Related Motion to the Middle District of Florida. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (blb) |
| Filing 3 Joint MOTION re #1 MOTION to Quash to Transfer Subpoena-Related Motion to the Middle District of Florida by ESSENTIUM INC. (DUPRE, STEVEN) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER. Defendant shall have until 4/22/2021, in which to file a response to the motion to compel, ECF No. #1 . The Clerk of Court shall refer this file upon Defendant's filing of a response, or no later than 4/22/2021. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 4/8/21. (blb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for MOTION TO QUASH DEFENDANT'SSUBPOENA TO 3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION. (blb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Defendant's Subpoena to 3D Systems Corporation ( Filing fee $49; receipt number BFLNDC-6022651.), filed by Jabil Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (WAGGONER, DENNIS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JABIL INC v. ESSENTIUM INC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ESSENTIUM INC | |
| Represented By: | D MATTHEW ALLEN |
| Represented By: | DARNESHA K CARTER |
| Represented By: | STEVEN C DUPRE |
| Represented By: | KEVIN P MCCOY |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JABIL INC | |
| Represented By: | DENNIS PARKER WAGGONER |
| Represented By: | MATTHEW F HALL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
