GEE v. SECRETARY OF DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Petitioner: ROBERT GEE
Respondent: SECRETARY OF DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and KMEOO KUNKA
Case Number: 4:2022cv00026
Filed: January 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: MARTIN A FITZPATRICK
Referring Judge: WILLIAM STAFFORD
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a Court Order. R&R flag set. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 3/30/2022. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 03/02/2022. (rcb)
March 1, 2022 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #3 Order. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb)**Filing Fee nor Amended Pleading Received***
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. The Clerk of Court shall forward to Plaintiff an application packet for requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis by state prisoners. Plaintiff has until 2/22/2022, to either: (1) file an amended in forma pauperis motion (which must include a signed prisoner consent form), or (2) pay the full amount ($402.00) of the filing fee The Clerk of Court shall also provide Plaintiff with a civil rights complaint form for use by state prisoners and a 2254 habeas petition. Plaintiff shall have until 2/22/2022, to file whichever form is appropriate. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of Plaintiff's compliance with this Order, or no later than 2/22/2022Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 01/21/2022. (rcb)**Application packet for requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis by state prisoners & a civil rights complaint form for use by prisoners forwarded as directed**
January 20, 2022 Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (rcb)
January 20, 2022 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #1 DEMAND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (rcb)
January 19, 2022 Filing 1 DEMAND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against KMEOO KUNKA, SECRETARY OF DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, filed by ROBERT GEE. (rcb)**No service copy nor IFP received**

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GEE v. SECRETARY OF DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ROBERT GEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SECRETARY OF DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: KMEOO KUNKA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?