HOWARD v. WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA INC
MAURICE HOWARD |
WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA, INC and WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA INC |
4:2022cv00053 |
February 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
MARK E WALKER |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by MAURICE HOWARD (MORGAN, CHARLES) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by MAURICE HOWARD. (MORGAN, CHARLES) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by MAURICE HOWARD. WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA INC waiver sent on 2/17/2022, answer due 4/18/2022. (MORGAN, CHARLES) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA INC. (TINGLEY, AMY) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by CHARLES RYAN MORGAN on behalf of MAURICE HOWARD (MORGAN, CHARLES) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA INC. (tpm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by AMY S TINGLEY on behalf of WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA INC (TINGLEY, AMY) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (BOTROS, PAUL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA, INC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6662715.), filed by MAURICE HOWARD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit SUMMONS) (BOTROS, PAUL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.