MALDONADO v. NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
Petitioner: SAMUEL MALDONADO
Respondent: NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
Case Number: 4:2022cv00162
Filed: April 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: MARTIN A FITZPATRICK
Referring Judge: MARK E WALKER
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2022 Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 6 Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in Southern District of New York as case 1:22-cv-04839, filed 06/09/2022. (rcb)
June 7, 2022 Filing 6 Interdistrict Transfer to the Southern District of New York at 500 Pearl St, New York, NY 10007. (rcb) **ECF #5 & NEF for 6 forwarded to Plaintiff/Case transferred as directed**
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The report and recommendation, ECF No. #3 , is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. This case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for all further proceedings. The Clerk shall take the necessary steps to effect the transfer and close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 06/06/2022. (tpm)
June 3, 2022 ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus filed by SAMUEL MALDONADO - R&R flag set (rcb)**No objections received by 6/2/2022**
May 11, 2022 Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to SAMUEL MALDONADO Re: 2 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) (rcb)**Address confirmed on BOP website**
May 2, 2022 Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. For the reasons stated, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a), it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for all further proceedings. R&R flag set. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 5/31/2022. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 05/02/2022. (rcb)
April 18, 2022 Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (rcb)
April 18, 2022 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND/OR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTICANDUM WITH ATTACHMENTS Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb)
April 15, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND/OR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTICANDUM WITH ATTACHMENTS by SAMUEL MALDONADO. (rcb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MALDONADO v. NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SAMUEL MALDONADO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?