MALDONADO v. NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
SAMUEL MALDONADO |
NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION |
4:2022cv00162 |
April 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
MARK E WALKER |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 6 Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in Southern District of New York as case 1:22-cv-04839, filed 06/09/2022. (rcb) |
Filing 6 Interdistrict Transfer to the Southern District of New York at 500 Pearl St, New York, NY 10007. (rcb) **ECF #5 & NEF for 6 forwarded to Plaintiff/Case transferred as directed** |
Filing 5 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The report and recommendation, ECF No. #3 , is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. This case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for all further proceedings. The Clerk shall take the necessary steps to effect the transfer and close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 06/06/2022. (tpm) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus filed by SAMUEL MALDONADO - R&R flag set (rcb)**No objections received by 6/2/2022** |
Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to SAMUEL MALDONADO Re: 2 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) (rcb)**Address confirmed on BOP website** |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. For the reasons stated, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a), it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for all further proceedings. R&R flag set. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 5/31/2022. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 05/02/2022. (rcb) |
Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND/OR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTICANDUM WITH ATTACHMENTS Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND/OR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTICANDUM WITH ATTACHMENTS by SAMUEL MALDONADO. (rcb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MALDONADO v. NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: SAMUEL MALDONADO | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.