TYSON et al v. SUWANEE RIVER AREA COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC et al
MARY BETH TYSON, RYAN TYSON and JDT |
SUWANEE RIVER AREA COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC., JOHN DOE and SUWANEE RIVER AREA COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC |
4:2022cv00174 |
May 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
ROBERT L HINKLE |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
29 U.S.C. ยง 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act) |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. 90 Day Exhibit Return Deadline set for 9/15/2022 (rcb) |
Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The plaintiff's claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court rule. The clerk must enter judgment and close the file. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 06/16/2022. (rcb) Modified to edit filing date on 6/22/2022 (rcb). |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE notified that action is needed Re: #7 Order. (rcb)**Show Cause Response Not Filed By 6/14/2022 Re: #7 ** |
Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. The plaintiff must show cause by 6/14/2022, while this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim, failure to prosecute, or failure to comply with Local Rule 7.1. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 05/31/2022. (rcb) |
Filing 6 DEFENDANT SUWANEE RIVER AREA COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC'S DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (SCARPONE, KAYLA) Modified to edit title on 5/27/2022 (rcb). |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE notified that action is needed Re: #4 Scheduling Order, (rcb)**Corporate Disclosure Statement not filed by Suwanee River Area Council of the Boy Scouts OF America Inc** |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Incorporated Memorandum of Law. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 5/31/2022). (rcb) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by SUWANEE RIVER AREA COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC.. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 5/27/2022). (SCARPONE, KAYLA) |
Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 5/25/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/24/2022. Discovery due by 1/6/2023. Attorney Conference due by 6/10/2022. Jury Trial set for 4/17/2023 08:15 AM in U.S. Courthouse Tallahassee before JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 05/11/2022. (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE notified that action is needed Re: #1 Notice of Removal, (rcb)**An ISO is needed** |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY by SUWANEE RIVER AREA COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Federal Notice of Removal) (SCARPONE, KAYLA) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (SCARPONE, KAYLA) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by SUWANEE RIVER AREA COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC. from LEON COUNTY SECOND JUDICIAL COURT, case number 2022 CA 000524. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6998856.), filed by SUWANEE RIVER AREA COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit COMPLAINT, #2 Exhibit SUMMONS, #3 Exhibit STATE DOCKET, #4 Exhibit NOTICE OF REMOVAL TO STATE COURT, #5 Exhibit NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY) (SCARPONE, KAYLA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.