PARKER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| JOHN EDWARD PARKER |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and INMATE ACCOUNT DEPT |
| 4:2022cv00205 |
| May 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered pursuant to ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ECf No. #8 . (tpm) (90 Day Exhibit Return Deadline set for 10/19/2022) |
Filing 8
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The report and recommendation, ECF No. #6 , is accepted and adopted, over the Plaintiff's objections, as this Court's opinion. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. #5 , is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), without prejudice to Plaintiff's initiating a new cause of action accompanied by payment of the $402.00 filing and administrative fees." The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 07/21/2022. (tpm)
|
| Filing 7 OBJECTION to June 29th #6 Report and Recommendations, by JOHN EDWARD PARKER. (mb) |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - For the reasons set forth above, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. #5 , be DENIED, and that this action be DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), without prejudice to Plaintiff's initiating a new cause of action accompanied by payment of the $402.00 filing and administrative fees. The clerk of court close this case file. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 7/29/2022.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 6/29/2022. (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #4 Amended Complaint. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JOHN EDWARD PARKER. (jcw) |
| Filing 4 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INMATE ACCOUNT DEPT, filed by JOHN EDWARD PARKER. (No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Complaint. The clerk of the court shall send Plaintiff a 1983 complaint form for use by prisoners, and a form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number shall be written on the forms. On or before 6/27/2022, Plaintiff shall: a. file a notice of voluntary dismissal; OR b. file an amended complaint on the Northern District form accompanied by either payment in the amount of $402.00, or a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 5/27/2022. (jcw)(Forms sent as ordered.)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (tpm) |
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (tpm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, titled "EMERGENCY RELEASE OF STIMULUS CHECKS" against All Defendants, filed by JOHN EDWARDS PARKER. (tpm) (No service copies received / Filing fee NOT paid. No IFP filed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
