IBLE v. ZILLOW HOME LOANS INC
| ISHANNA IBLE |
| ZILLOW HOME LOANS INC |
| 4:2022cv00238 |
| July 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| ALLEN C WINSOR |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to pay the filing fee, ECF No. #6 , is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have until September 12, 2022, in which to file an amended in forma pauperis motion or, in the alternative, to pay the filing fee ($402.00) for this case. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of Plaintiff's compliance with this Order or no later than September 12, 2022. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 8/11/2022. (kjw)
|
| Set Deadlines: Notify Chambers on 9/12/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 9/12/2022 or Fee due by 9/12/2022. (kjw) |
| Filing 7 Notice and First Amended Complaint against ZILLOW HOME LOANS INC, filed by ISHANNA IBLE. (kjw) |
| Filing 6 Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee filed by ISHANNA IBLE. (kjw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #7 Amended Complaint, #6 MOTION to Extend Time. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (kjw) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER. The Clerk of Court shall provide Plaintiff with an in forma pauperis application packet used in this Court. Plaintiff shall have until 8/12/2022, in which to file an amended in forma pauperis motion or, in the alternative, to pay the filing fee ($402.00) for this case. Plaintiff shall have until 8/12/2022, in which to file an amended complaint if there is a basis to do so. In the alternative, Plaintiff must file a notice of voluntary dismissal. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of Plaintiff's compliance with this Order or no later than 8/12/2022. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 07/12/2022. (rcb)**IFP PACKET FORWARDED AS DIRECTED**
|
| Filing 4 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
| Filing 3 (FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT) MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ISHANNA IBLE. (rcb) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (rcb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ZILLOW HOME LOANS INC, filed by ISHANNA IBLE. (rcb)**No service copy received** |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: IBLE v. ZILLOW HOME LOANS INC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ISHANNA IBLE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ZILLOW HOME LOANS INC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
