LORUSSO v DESANTIS
MICHAEL ANTHONY LORUSSO |
RON DESANTIS |
4:2022cv00362 |
October 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
ROBERT L HINKLE |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 14 MOTION FOR REHEARING by MICHAEL ANTHONY LORUSSO (rcb) |
Filing 13 DOCUMENT TITLED DIRECTIVE ORDER by MICHAEL ANTHONY LORUSSO (rcb) |
![]() |
Filing 11 WRITTEN OBJECTIONS WITH ATTACHMENTS by MICHAEL ANTHONY LORUSSO (rcb) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. 90 Day Exhibit Return Deadline set for 2/2/2023 (rcb) |
![]() |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE notified that action is needed Re: #8 Objection to Report and Recommendations (rcb)**Notice of Appeal (Objection to Report & Recommendation) filed** |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL (OBJECTION) to #5 Report and Recommendations by MICHAEL ANTHONY LORUSSO. (rcb) |
![]() |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #6 TRANSFER OF THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE WITH ATTACHMENTS. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
Filing 6 TRANSFER OF THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE WITH ATTACHMENTS by MICHAEL ANTHONY LORUSSO (rcb) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the case be DISMISSED under the three- strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) because Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee at the time he initiated this case and fails to meet the imminent danger exception. Dismissal with prejudice for lack of standing is also appropriate. It is further RECOMMENDED that the case be CLOSED. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 11/14/2022. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 10/14/2022. (rcb) |
Filing 4 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) |
Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of Texas Eastern; Case Number 6:22-cv-00376. Original file documents numbered 1-2 received. |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb)**No filing fee nor service copies received** |
![]() |
Interdistrict transfer to the Northern District of Florida. (wea, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 10/7/2022.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ron DeSantis, filed by Michael LoRusso. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope(s))(wea, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 10/7/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: LORUSSO v DESANTIS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: MICHAEL ANTHONY LORUSSO | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: RON DESANTIS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.