FRANKLIN v. DIXON
| JOSHUA D FRANKLIN |
| RICKY D DIXON, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2 |
| 4:2022cv00371 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| WILLIAM STAFFORD |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 4 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in Middle District of Florida - Jacksonville Division, as case 3:22-cv-1164, filed 10/28/2022. (mb) |
| Filing 4 Interdistrict Transfer to the MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE located at BRYAN SIMPSON US COURTHOUSE, 300 N HOGAN STREET, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202. (mb) |
Filing 3
ORDER. The clerk of court shall forthwith TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, and shall close this case file. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 10/28/2022. (mb)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (tpm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (tpm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by JOSHUA D FRANKLIN. (tpm) (No service copies. Filing fees NOT paid / No IFP filed.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
