ADAMS v. PILOT CORPORATION
| CALVIN ADAMS and TODD MINER LAW |
| PILOT CORPORATION and Tabitha Jackson |
| 4:2022cv00393 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE notified that action is needed Re: #7 Initial Scheduling Order. Corporate Disclosure Statement has not been filed. (ckm) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER Re: #10 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting : Discovery due by 9/11/2023. Dispositive Motions to be filed by 8/21/2023. Jury Trial set for 11/6/2023 08:15 AM in U.S. Courthouse Tallahassee before JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE. Mediation to take place by 9/25/2023. Mediation Report due by 9/29/2023. Case referred to mediation. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 12/06/2022. (tpm)
|
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (JACKSON, TABITHA) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 11/30/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/23/2022. Discovery due by 7/10/2023. Jury Trial set for 11/6/2023 08:15 AM in U.S. Courthouse Tallahassee before JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 11/16/2022. (tpm)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER DENYING THE DEEMED MOTION TO REMAND: The response to the notice of removal is deemed a motion to remand. The motion is denied. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 11/15/2022. (tpm)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER FOR A MEDICAL EXAMINATION: The defendant's unopposed motion to require the plaintiff to submit to a medical examination, ECF No. #4 , is granted. The plaintiff must appear for and cooperate in an examination of appropriate scope, as requested in the motion, by Marc J. Dinkin, M.D., on December 20, 2022. The parties may change the date by agreement. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 11/15/2022. (tpm)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by BRANDON JAY BORNSTEIN on behalf of CALVIN ADAMS (BORNSTEIN, BRANDON) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE by CALVIN ADAMS re #1 Notice of Removal, by CALVIN ADAMS. (BORNSTEIN, BRANDON) |
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Medical Exam by PILOT CORPORATION. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 11/25/2022). (JACKSON, TABITHA) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (JACKSON, TABITHA) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT RE #1 Notice of Removal, filed by PILOT CORPORATION: Attorney Tabitha G Jackson - Counsel is advised by this entry, that a Civil Cover Sheet should be filed as a separate entry using the event selection "Civil Cover Sheet" which is found under "Other Filings" under "Other Documents". PLEASE RE-FILE THE CIVIL COVER SHEET. (tpm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE notified that action is needed Re: #1 Notice of Removal **ISO NEEDED** (tpm) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by PILOT CORPORATION from Second Circuit in Gadsden County Florida, case number 2022-CA-00578. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7548204.), filed by PILOT CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit from Defendant, #2 Exhibit Composite State Filings, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Notice of Appearance) (JACKSON, TABITHA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
