WILLIAMS v. LAWSON et al
| JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS |
| AL LAWSON, JR, RON DESANTIS, LORRAIN AUSLEY, RICK SCOTT, CYNITHA BARBER, BENITA CASCE and WILLIAM MONTFORD |
| 4:2022cv00436 |
| December 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 11(c), #23-10057 the Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Florida certifies that the record is complete for purposes of this appeal re: #15 Notice of Appeal, Appeal No. 23-10057. The entire record on appeal is available electronically. (rcb) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE TO JUDGE WALKER RE: re #24 ORDER DENYING #23 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (rcb) |
Filing 24
ORDER DENYING #23 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion, ECF No. #23 , is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 01/19/2023. (rcb)
|
| Filing 23 Letter Requesting Reconsideration of #18 by JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS. (rcb) |
| Filing 22 THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against AL LAWSON, JR, filed by JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS. (rcb)**No service copy provided** |
|
Filing 20
ORDER REGARDING #19 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. This Order acknowledges that Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed a second amended complaint. ECF No. #19 . Given Plaintiff's pending appeal, see ECF Nos. #10 and #15 (Notices of Appeal), this Court will take no further action in this case until the appeal is resolved. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 01/13/2023. (rcb)
|
| Filing 19 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against AL LAWSON, JR, filed by JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS. (rcb)**No service copy received** |
|
Filing 18
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Accordingly, Williams's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. #17 , is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 01/13/2023. (rcb)
|
| Filing 16 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #15 Notice of Appeal. (rcb) |
| Set Deadlines re #15 Notice of Appeal. Clerk to check status of Appeal on 4/13/2023. Certificate of Readiness (FRAP 11) due by 1/27/2023. (rcb) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS. (rcb) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #14 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS. (rcb) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Williams's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. #11 , is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/10/2023. (kjw)
|
| Filing 21 USCA Acknowledgment- Appeal # 23-10057-H Re: #15 Notice of Appeal (rcb) |
| Filing 13 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #10 Notice of Appeal. Set Deadlines re #10 Notice of Appeal :( Appeal Record due by 1/20/2023., Clerk to check status of Appeal on 3/6/2023.) (pll) |
| Filing 12 Appeal Instructions re: #10 Notice of Appeal : The Transcript Request Form is available on the Internet at https://www.flnd.uscourts.gov/form/eleventh-circuit-transcript-information-form **PLEASE NOTE** Separate forms must be filed for each court reporter in both the district court and the appeals court. Transcript Order Form due by 1/20/2023. (pll) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS. (pll) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Order, #8 Clerk's Judgment by JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS. (pll) |
| Filing 9 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS. (pll) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered pursuant to #7 Order. (vkm) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER ACCEPTING #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii)." The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/3/202. (vkm)
|
| Filing 6 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendations titled "NOTICE OF APPEAL AND OBJECTION TO DISTRICT JUDGE" by JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS. (jcw) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. Because Plaintiff's complaint is factually and legally frivolous and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that the District Court: DISMISS this action with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)(ii); and DIRECT the clerk of the court to terminate all pending motions and close this case file. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 1/13/2023.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 12/14/2022. (jcw) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 12/13/2022. (jcw)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS. (jcw) |
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (tpm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS. (tpm) (No service copies provided. Filing fee NOT paid / No pending IFP.) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (tpm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
