KESSLER v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA FLORIDA 2ND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT et al
PHILLIP MICHAEL KESSLER |
THE STATE OF FLORIDA FLORIDA 2ND JUDICIAL CIRUCIT COURT, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TALLAHASSEE PPOLICE DEPARTMENT, NORTH FLORIDA ICAC, UNITED STATES AIR FORCE OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT and FLORIDA SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT |
4:2023cv00052 |
January 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
MARK E WALKER |
Prisoner Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #11 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT (rcb) |
Filing 11 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT by PHILLIP MICHAEL KESSLER (rcb) |
Filing 10 ORDER denying #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. On or before 4/3/2023, Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court the $402.00 fee. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 3/2/2023. (jcw) |
Filing 8 ORDER AMENDING CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case reassigned to MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK for all further proceedings. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK no longer assigned to case. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 11/14/2022. Motions referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #9 ORDER. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (rcb) |
Filing 9 ORDER. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for disqualification, ECF No. #5 , is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall reassign this case to another Magistrate Judge within this District given my recusal. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 03/01/2023. (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #6 Notice of Change of Address, #5 MOTION for Recusal, #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by PHILLIP MICHAEL KESSLER. (rcb) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by PHILLIP MICHAEL KESSLER (rcb)**Address updated from 2416 JACKSON BLUFF ROAD #C2 to 4721 DICK MITHCELL DRIVE, TALLAHASEE, FLORIDA 32303** |
Filing 5 MOTION for Recusal by PHILLIP MICHAEL KESSLER. (rcb) |
Filing 4 ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, ECF No. #2 , is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may resubmit a proper IFP application with the correct form or pay the $402 filing fee no later than March 1, 2023. 2. The Clerk shall forward to Plaintiff an IFP application for non-prisoners along with a copy of this Order. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 02/03/2023. (rcb)***IFP APPLICATION (NON-PRISONER) FORWARDED AS DIRECTED** |
Set Deadlines/Hearings Notify Chambers/ Fee/IFP MOTION due by 3/1/2023. (rcb) |
Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by PHILLIP MICHAEL KESSLER. (rcb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by PHILLIP MICHAEL KESSLER. (rcb)**No service copy nor filing fee received** |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.