REYNOLDS v. DIXON
Petitioner: RAYMOND REYNOLDS
Respondent: RICKY D DIXON, ASHLEY MOODY and MELLISSA BLACKWELL
Case Number: 4:2023cv00130
Filed: April 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: ZACHARY C BOLITHO
Referring Judge: ALLEN C WINSOR
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Within thirty days of the date of this order, Petitioner must show cause, if any, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the Court. (Show Cause Response due by 6/22/2023.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 5/23/2023. (jcw)
May 10, 2023 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #3 Order - No response filed. (jcw)
April 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Clerk of Court is directed to modify the docket to reflect that Ricky D. Dixon is the sole Respondent in this case. The Clerk also must send Petitioner a petition form for use in 2254 cases, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and a prisoner consent form and financial certificate approved for use in this Court. The Clerk should place this case number on the forms. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Petitioner must file an amended petition on the Court-approved form. Also within that time, Petitioner must:a. submit payment in the amount of $5.00; OR b. file a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the Court-approved form. (Amended Petition due by 5/4/2023., IFP/Fee due by 5/4/2023.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 4/4/2023. (jcw)(Forms sent as ordered.)
April 4, 2023 Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (jcw)
April 4, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by RAYMOND REYNOLDS. (Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.)(Sent to USCA in error.) (jcw)
April 4, 2023 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jcw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: REYNOLDS v. DIXON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RAYMOND REYNOLDS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: RICKY D DIXON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ASHLEY MOODY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MELLISSA BLACKWELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?