WINSTEAD v. NEWREZ LLC
| James Winstead |
| NEWREZ, LLC, d/b/a SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING and NEWREZ LLC doing business as SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING LLC |
| 4:2023cv00180 |
| May 8, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER CLOSING THE FILE - The clerk must close the file. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 5/31/23. (sjb)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JAMES WINSTEAD (KIM, YOUNG) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by NEWREZ LLC identifying Other Affiliate Shellpoint Partners LLC, Other Affiliate NRM Acquisition LLC, Other Affiliate NRM Acquisition II LLC, Other Affiliate New Residential Mortgage LLC, Other Affiliate Rithm Capital Corp., Other Affiliate Rithm Capital Corp., fka New Residential Investment Corp. for NEWREZ LLC.. (APPELBAUM, STEVEN) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Compliance with Local Rule 7.2(A) by NEWREZ LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit proposed Summons/Notice to Appear for Pretrial Conference and Order Referring Case to Mediation, #2 Exhibit Return of Service for the Summons/Notice to Appear for Pretrial Conference and Order Referring Case to Mediation from the State Court Action, #3 Exhibit Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal) (APPELBAUM, STEVEN) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER : Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 5/25/2023. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/26/2023. Attorney Conference to take place by 6/12/2023. Discovery due by 12/12/2023.Jury Trial set for 4/1/2024 08:15 AM in U.S. Courthouse Tallahassee before JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 5/11/23. (sjb)
|
| Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Further, Counsel is advised that for all future pleadings in this case and any future cases assigned to Judge Hinkle, exhibits attached to a document filing should be properly identified in the docket text when posting the document. (Example: Deposition of John Doe rather than Exhibit A.) (rcb) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: To Attorney STEVEN M APPELBAUM, Re #1 Notice of Removal - The parties named in the above referenced document were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. For future reference, please review the procedures for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or Chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide" (both available on the clerk's website at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. Additionally, Counsel is advised by this entry, that a Civil Cover Sheet should be filed as a separate entry using the event selection "Civil Cover Sheet" which is found under "Other Filings" under "Other Documents. (kjw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE notified that action is needed Re: #1 Notice of Removal. (rcb)**An ISO is needed** |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by NEWREZ, LLC, d/b/a SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING from County Court, Third Judicial Circuit, Taylor County, Florida, case number 23-082SC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7859469.), filed by NEWREZ, LLC, d/b/a SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (APPELBAUM, STEVEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
