GODBOLT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
| JAMES ANTHONY GODBOLT |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 4:2023cv00250 |
| June 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER. On or before August 10, 2023, Plaintiff shall show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with a court order, and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff's failure to comply timely with this order likely will result in dismissal of this action for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with a court order, and failure to prosecute. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 07/27/23. (Show Cause Response due by 8/10/2023.) (jfj)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #4 Order - IFP/Filing fee were not received. (jcw) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff: (a) a motion to proceed in forma pauperis for use by prisoners and (b) a Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate approved for use in the Northern District of Florida. On or before 7/13/2023, Plaintiff shall: a. pay the $402 fee ($350 filing fee and $52 administrative fee) to the clerk of the court; or b. submit a fully completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis with an attached Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate signed by a prison official and a computer printout of the transactions in plaintiff's inmate trust account during the six-month period of incarceration preceding the filing of this suit. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 6/13/2023. (jcw)(Form sent as ordered.)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS by JAMES ANTHONY GODBOLT. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, filed by JAMES ANTHONY GODBOLT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GODBOLT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAMES ANTHONY GODBOLT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
