THOMAS v. REID et al
| SHERMAN LYNELL THOMAS |
| FRANK MADISON REID, TAN CLARENCE MOSS, FRANK MADISON REID, III and GARRY BERNARD REED |
| 4:2023cv00393 |
| September 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| ALLEN C WINSOR |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
REFERRAL AND ORDER granting #4 MOTION TO ATTACH ADDENDUM TO ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 10/13/2023. (jcw)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION TO ATTACH ADDENDUM TO ORIGINAL COMPLAINT by SHERMAN LYNELL THOMAS. (baf) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION TO ATTACH ADDENDUM TO ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (baf) |
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (jcw) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 400001095. Fee status updated to paid. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TAN CLARENCE MOSS, FRANK MADISON REID, GARRY BERNARD REED, filed by SHERMAN LYNELL THOMAS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(Filing fee was paid. 3 service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
