EARLY v. STUBBS ROOFING COMPANY
| EARLY DESHUR and DESHUR EARLY |
| STUBBS ROOFING COMPANY |
| 4:2023cv00453 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| WILLIAM STAFFORD |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD notified that action is needed Re: #3 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. ***Rule 26 Meeting Report has not been filed by the designated deadline date of 12/6/2023.*** (baf) |
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW - Counsel's motion to withdraw (ECF No. #10 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff, Deshur Early, shall have until 1/3/2024, to: (a) file a notice of intent to proceed without an attorney; or (b) have new counsel file a notice of appearance. In addition to sending copies of this order to counsel, the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy to Plaintiff at both the address provided by counsel (see ECF No. #10 ) and the facility currently listed for him in the FDCs Corrections Offender Network (Suwannee C.I.). If Plaintiff fails to respond to this order on or before 1/3/2024, the clerk is directed to enter judgment of dismissal for failure to prosecute without further order of the court. The clerk shall note on the docket that Marie A. Mattox and Marie A. Mattox, P.A., are no longer counsel of record for Plaintiff. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 12/6/2023. (baf) (Documents sent by mail per order instructions.)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney (Partially Consented) by DESHUR EARLY. (MATTOX, MARIE) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - Plaintiff's second motion (ECF No. #8 ) for extension of time is GRANTED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 11/10/2023. (baf) (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 11/27/2023).)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by DESHUR EARLY. (MATTOX, MARIE) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. #6 ) for extension of time is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have up to and including 11/9/2023, to respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 11/7/2023. (baf)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by DESHUR EARLY. (MATTOX, MARIE) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by STUBBS ROOFING COMPANY. (SCARPONE, KAYLA) |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by STUBBS ROOFING COMPANY. (SCARPONE, KAYLA) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER : Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 11/6/2023. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/6 /2023. Discovery due by 2/17/2024. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 10/23/2023. (baf)
|
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (SCARPONE, KAYLA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by STUBBS ROOFING COMPANY from Second Judicial Circuit Court, Leon County, case number 2023-ca-002017. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-8332180.), filed by STUBBS ROOFING COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B- Notice to State Court and Adverse Party) (SCARPONE, KAYLA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
