ENGSTROM v. KIJAKAZI
| Michael Shawn Engstrom |
| Secretary Social Security and KILOLO KIJAKAZI |
| 4:2023cv00486 |
| November 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| WILLIAM STAFFORD |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SS TRANSCRIPT/ADMIN RECORD by KILOLO KIJAKAZI by KILOLO KIJAKAZI. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9) (HOLZBERGER, MALIA) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by MALIA L HOLZBERGER on behalf of KILOLO KIJAKAZI (HOLZBERGER, MALIA) |
Filing 9
ORDER: Defendant must respond to the complaint within SIXTY DAYS after notice of the action is given. Within THIRTY DAYS of service of the answer, Plaintiff shall file and serve on the Commissioner a memorandum in support of his/her complaint. Within THIRTY DAYS of service of Plaintiff's memorandum, Defendant shall file and serve a memorandum in support of the Commissioner's decision. Within FOURTEEN DAYS after service of Defendant's brief, Plaintiff may, but is not required to, file a reply brief and serve it on the Commissioner. (Answer due by 2/20/2024., Memorandum in Support due by 3/21/2024., Memorandum in Opposition due by 4/22/2024., Replies due by 5/6/2024.) (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 12/22/2023. (jcw)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 12/22/2023. (jcw)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis . Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHAEL SHAWN ENGSTROM. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS) (BACHARACH, N) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re #5 Financial Affidavit. On or before 12/22/2023, Plaintiff shall pay the $402.00 fee or submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 12/8/2023. (jcw)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #5 Financial Affidavit. (jcw) |
| Filing 5 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by MICHAEL SHAWN ENGSTROM. (BACHARACH, N) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (BACHARACH, N) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Service: AUSA PETER G. FISHER has been added to the docket for service and notice purposes only. (jcw) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The Civil Cover Sheet, doc. #1 -2, was not properly completed. Please file a fully executed Civil Cover Sheet pursuant to Local Rule 5.2. (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint - Filing fee was not paid. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT By Plaintiff against Michael Shawn Engstrom, filed by Michael Shawn Engstrom. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Appeals Council Denial, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (BACHARACH, N) (Attachment 2 (Civil Cover Sheet) replaced on 11/9/2023 to correct viewing issues.) (kjw). (Attachment 2 replaced on 11/9/2023) (kjw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
