TAYLOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
| LEONARD WAYNE TAYLOR |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON |
| 4:2024cv00092 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 4 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in Middle District of Florida as case 2:24cv00183. (jcw) |
| Filing 4 Interdistrict Transfer to the Middle District of Florida. (jcw) |
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The clerk of court shall forthwith transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida for all further proceedings. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 2/28/2024. (jcw)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by LEONARD WAYNE TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
