RASH v. DIXON
Heather Rash |
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON |
4:2024cv00098 |
February 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
MARK E WALKER |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 754 Discrimination |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #2 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. ***Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/11/2024 has not been filed.*** (baf) |
Set/Reset #2 Deadlines: Status Report due by 4/27/2024. (baf) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by RICKY DIXON. (VARNELL, STEPHEN) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by STEPHEN KYLE VARNELL on behalf of RICKY DIXON (VARNELL, STEPHEN) |
Filing 4 NOTICE Amended Civil Cover Sheet by RICKY DIXON re #3 Civil Cover Sheet (MOORE, THOMASINA) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (MOORE, THOMASINA) |
Filing 2 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER - Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 3/12/2024. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/11/2024. Discovery due by 6/26/2024. Status Report due by 3/28/2024. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 2/27/2024. (baf) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS from Leon County Circuit Court, case number 2023CA002777. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AFLNDC-8645113.), filed by FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. (MOORE, THOMASINA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.