JONES v. SOLITARY WATCH et al
JESSIE W JONES |
SOLITARY WATCH, DONALD J TRUMP, JOHN KIRBY, C HARTLEY, LAUREN BOOK, MARK S INCH, PATRICK MAHONEY, MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT DEPARTMENT, CATHY TIJERINA, T DIX, FW MARTINEZ, D DIAZ, CO GREEN, HERNANDEZ, K JONES, WALKER, D JONES, S CASTRO, J HELTON, J BROWN and J RODRIGUEZ |
4:2024cv00133 |
March 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
WILLIAM STAFFORD |
Prisoner Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT pursuant to #5 ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (baf) |
|
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD notified that action is needed Re: #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. ***No objections filed by the due date of 4/19/2024.*** (baf) |
|
Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (baf) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (baf) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JESSIE W JONES. (baf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by JESSIE W JONES. (baf) (No service copies provided.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.