HALE v. HALE et al
| RODRICK HALE |
| RENEE HALE, TERRENCE HALE, TERRY MITHELL, SR, TERRY MITHELL, JR, KIENYATTA POWELL, CIGI LINCOLN, TIFFANY LINCOLN, MANNY KNLOSKI and SENATOR PARTY OTHER NAMES OR UNKNOWN INVOLVE |
| 4:2024cv00156 |
| April 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| ALLEN C WINSOR |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Partial Filing fee: $ 20.00, receipt number 5/20/24-DOC. Balance $315.00 (rcb) |
Filing 13
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. For the reasons stated, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED for failure to comply with court orders pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and N.D. Fla. L. R. 41.1. See also Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 837 (11th Cir. 1989) (While dismissal is an extraordinary remedy, dismissal upon disregard of an order, especially where the litigant has been R&R flag set. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 6/10/2024. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 5/13/2024. (rcb) Modified to edit title on 5/15/2024 (rcb).
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The #11 IFP application is implausible and is DENIED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 5/13/2024. (rcb) Modified to edit title on 5/15/2024 (rcb).
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by RODRICK HALE. (rcb) |
| Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by RODRICK HALE. (rcb)**NO SERVICE COPY RECEIVED** |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #11 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis, #10 First Amended Complaint. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER. Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, ECF No. #7 , is STRICKEN as an improper pleading and will not be considered. Plaintiffs second "Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis," ECF No. #8 , is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall provide Plaintiff with a civil rights complaint form and the application to proceed in forma pauperis (long form) for use by non- prisoners, along with a copy of this Order and the courts prior order to amend, ECF No. #6 . Plaintiff shall have until May 6, 2024, to file a second amended complaint, if Plaintiff wants to continue with this case. If Plaintiff no longer seeks to proceed with this case, he should file a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) by May 6, 2024. The Clerk of Court shall return this case upon Plaintiff's compliance with this Order or no later than May 6, 2024. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 4/18/2024. (rcb)**FORMS FORWARDED AS DIRECTED**
|
| Set Deadline- Re: #9 Notify Chambers /Amended Pleadings /Notice of Voluntary Dismissal / IFP Motion due by 5/6/2024. (rcb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #8 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, #7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by RODRICK HALE. (rcb) |
| Filing 7 **STRICKEN PER ECF #9 ** FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by RODRICK HALE. (rcb)**NO SERVICE COPY RECEIVED** Modified to edit title on 4/18/2024 (rcb). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER - The Clerk of Court shall provide Plaintiff with a civil rights complaint form for use by non-prisoners. Plaintiff shall have until 5/6/2024, to file the amended complaint, if Plaintiff desires to continue with this case. If Plaintiff no longer seeks to proceed with this case, he should file a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) by 5/6/2024. The Clerk of Court shall return this case upon Plaintiff's compliance with this Order or no later than 5/6/2024. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 4/5/2024. (baf) (Civil rights complaint form provided by mail per order instructions for non-prisoners.)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER - Plaintiff's "Motion Requesting Appointment of Counsel," ECF No. #2 , is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, ECF No. #4 , is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to forward to Plaintiff the application to proceed in forma pauperis for use by a non-prisoner plaintiff. No later than 5/6/2024, Plaintiff shall either file a proper in forma pauperis application or, alternatively, pay the $402 filing fee by the same deadline. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 4/5/2024. (baf) (Application to proceed in forma pauperis for use by a non-prisoner plaintiff sent by mail per order instructions.)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by RODRICK HALE. (rcb) |
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION REQUESTING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by RODRICK HALE. (rcb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by RODRICK HALE. (rcb)**NO SERVICE COPY RECEIVED** |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (rcb) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge re #4 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis, #2 MOTION REQUESTING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
