WILLIAMS v. LECKING et al
| ANTHONY VERON WILLIAMS |
| MICHAEL LECKING and BRIAN SPEIGNER |
| 4:2026cv00040 |
| January 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER ON AMENDED COMPLAINT - Inasmuch as this case has been dismissed, the new complaint is treated as a nullity. Plaintiff has leave to open a new case and pay the filing fee or move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis at that time. As for this case, it remains closed. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 2/24/26. (sjb)
|
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against MICHAEL LECKING, BRIAN SPEIGNER, filed by ANTHONY VERON WILLIAMS. (djb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - This case is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new lawsuit that complies with the local rules. The Clerk shall close the case file. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 2/18/26. (sjb)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MICHAEL LECKING, BRIAN SPEIGNER, filed by ANTHONY VERON WILLIAMS. (Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
