DAGENHART v. BISIGNANO
| DAVID WALKER DAGENHART |
| FRANK BISIGNANO |
| 4:2026cv00166 |
| April 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Based on the notice and consent of the parties, ECF No. #7 , this case is reassigned to the Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings, including trial, directing the entry of judgment, and post-judgment matters. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Any appeal will be directly to the Court of Appeals. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 5/4/2026. (rcb)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE Consent to Magistrate Judge by DAVID WALKER DAGENHART (BERGER, ERIK) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER re #1 Complaint: Defendant must respond to the complaint within SIXTY DAYS after notice of the action is given. Within THIRTY DAYS of service of the answer, Plaintiff shall file and serve on the Commissioner a memorandum in support of his or her complaint. Within THIRTY DAYS of service of Plaintiff's memorandum, Defendant shall file and serve a memorandum in support of the Commissioner's decision. Within FOURTEEN DAYS after service of Defendant's brief, Plaintiff may, but is not required to, file a reply brief and serve it on the Commissioner. (Answer due by 6/9/2026., Memorandum in Support due by 7/9/2026., Memorandum in Opposition due by 8/10/2026., Replies due by8/24/2026.) (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 4/10/2026. (jcw)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 4/9/2026. (jcw)
|
| Filing 4 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: NOTICE of Service: AUSA PETER G. FISHER has been added to the docket for service and notice purposes only. (rcb) |
| Filing 3 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DAVID WALKER DAGENHART. (BERGER, ERIK) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (BERGER, ERIK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FRANK BISIGNANO, filed by DAVID WALKER DAGENHART. (BERGER, ERIK) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 COMPLAINT, #3 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis . Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (rcb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DAGENHART v. BISIGNANO | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DAVID WALKER DAGENHART | |
| Represented By: | ERIK W BERGER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FRANK BISIGNANO | |
| Represented By: | PETER GUNNAR FISHER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
