WRIGHT v. BROUGHTON et al
| ROBERT WRIGHT, ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III and PERRY ELLIS |
| JOSEPH BROUGHTON, WEBSTER BIVENS, MARK E WALKER, NELSON A ROCKEFELLER and LEE STROBEL |
| 4:2026cv00270 |
| June 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. For the reasons set forth above, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that the District Court: DISMISS this action without prejudice to Plaintiff initiating a new case accompanied by payment of the $405.00 fee in its entirety. DIRECT the clerk of the court to close this case file. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 7/9/2026.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 6/9/2026. (jcw) |
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS by ROBERT WRIGHT. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by ROBERT WRIGHT. (Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.