GAYLORD v. DESANTIS et al
| S. Cary Gaylord |
| Governor RONALD DESANTIS, Michael Fox Orr and Jefferson Knight |
| 4:2026cv00545 |
| October 14, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Caleb Trotter.( Filing fee $ 219 receipt number AFLNDC-10085040.) by S. Cary Gaylord. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Certificate of Good Standing) (TROTTER, CALEB) |
Filing 4
ORDER ADMITTING CAITLYN FELLNER PRO HAC VICE (granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice). Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 10/14/2026. (ckm)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE - Summons - DeSantis by S. Cary Gaylord (Attachments: #1 Supplement - Summons - Orr, #2 Supplement - Summons - Knight) (FELLNER, CAITLYN) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Caitlyn Fellner.( Filing fee $ 219 receipt number AFLNDC-10084597.) by S. Cary Gaylord. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Certificate of Good Standing) (FELLNER, CAITLYN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RONALD DESANTIS, Jefferson Knight, Michael Fox Orr ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AFLNDC-10084542.), filed by S. Cary Gaylord. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (FELLNER, CAITLYN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.